<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turtle&#8217;s head done in by kiss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biscit</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>Biscit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1488</guid>
		<description>Hmm... well...  for me there were far worse sexual references between Mickey and Rose two episodes beforehand, but I suppose they went under MediaWatch&#039;s radar.

Still no mention on their website- but that could be because they are rubbish with new fangled technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; well&#8230;  for me there were far worse sexual references between Mickey and Rose two episodes beforehand, but I suppose they went under MediaWatch&#8217;s radar.</p>
<p>Still no mention on their website- but that could be because they are rubbish with new fangled technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1482</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1482</guid>
		<description>Well they had pooves on Live and Kicking - John Barrowman used to be a presenter on that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they had pooves on Live and Kicking &#8211; John Barrowman used to be a presenter on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy A</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>MW haven&#039;t spotted that the guy playing Captain Jack - John Barrowman - is himself gay, and out and proud. Whatever next? They&#039;ll be having pooves on &lt;i&gt;Blue Peter&lt;/i&gt; next! (FYI: My impression of the 1996 furore was that the Doctor was seen as a sexual being, and has hitherto been asexual, as far as we the viewers were able to tell. Same in the novels. The kiss with Captain Jack was not a sexual thing, but the Eccleston Doctor did not flinch, merely reciprocated in the manner the kiss was given. I think the (out gay) exec producer and the writer of this two-parter, Russell T Davies, was making a deliberate point about having the Doc kiss both the male and female in just the same way, leaving us to interpret the kisses as we might.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MW haven&#8217;t spotted that the guy playing Captain Jack &#8211; John Barrowman &#8211; is himself gay, and out and proud. Whatever next? They&#8217;ll be having pooves on <i>Blue Peter</i> next! (FYI: My impression of the 1996 furore was that the Doctor was seen as a sexual being, and has hitherto been asexual, as far as we the viewers were able to tell. Same in the novels. The kiss with Captain Jack was not a sexual thing, but the Eccleston Doctor did not flinch, merely reciprocated in the manner the kiss was given. I think the (out gay) exec producer and the writer of this two-parter, Russell T Davies, was making a deliberate point about having the Doc kiss both the male and female in just the same way, leaving us to interpret the kisses as we might.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Factor</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Factor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>In the new series the Doctor will face his greatest advesary yet. Stephen Green and John Beyer who go around the universe trying to rid &quot;smut&quot; and &quot;filth&quot; from TV screens by EXTERMINATING TV sets.

Lol!

I didnt even know Cap Jack was bi-sexual. I thought that &quot;kiss&quot; was a joke. My family laughed when they saw it. Seems Dave Turtle and mediawatch need a sense of humour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the new series the Doctor will face his greatest advesary yet. Stephen Green and John Beyer who go around the universe trying to rid &#8220;smut&#8221; and &#8220;filth&#8221; from TV screens by EXTERMINATING TV sets.</p>
<p>Lol!</p>
<p>I didnt even know Cap Jack was bi-sexual. I thought that &#8220;kiss&#8221; was a joke. My family laughed when they saw it. Seems Dave Turtle and mediawatch need a sense of humour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Was it just me, or did anyone else get the feeling that the BBC was having a bit of a laugh at Christian Voice in the last episode of Doctor Who on Saturday?

Listening to the Emperor Dalek proclaiming himself as God, and all the other Daleks screaming &quot;blaspehemy, blasphemy&quot; at the Doctor, immediately brought the JSTO/Christian Voice episode back into my head, certainly a memorable episode, great fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it just me, or did anyone else get the feeling that the BBC was having a bit of a laugh at Christian Voice in the last episode of Doctor Who on Saturday?</p>
<p>Listening to the Emperor Dalek proclaiming himself as God, and all the other Daleks screaming &#8220;blaspehemy, blasphemy&#8221; at the Doctor, immediately brought the JSTO/Christian Voice episode back into my head, certainly a memorable episode, great fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I don't wish to spread any gossip, but...</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>I don't wish to spread any gossip, but...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>Last Doctor Who post for a while 

Given the furore certain aspects of the 1996 Doctor Who TV Movie caused, it&#039;s remarkable as to how far we have come as a society that only a tiny minority of fans on a message board have said anything about it. OK, according to MediaWatchWatch one of ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Doctor Who post for a while </p>
<p>Given the furore certain aspects of the 1996 Doctor Who TV Movie caused, it&#8217;s remarkable as to how far we have come as a society that only a tiny minority of fans on a message board have said anything about it. OK, according to MediaWatchWatch one of &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biscit</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Biscit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1477</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m being a bit too smug, but I&#039;m quite impressed, given the furoure at the Doctor kissing Grace in 1996, at the way few people are even batting an eyelid at this.

As yet there appears to be no reaction on the Media Watch site, do I take it that even they are embarassed at being seen to object to this sort of thing, and they&#039;re going to brush Turtle&#039;s outburst under the carpet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m being a bit too smug, but I&#8217;m quite impressed, given the furoure at the Doctor kissing Grace in 1996, at the way few people are even batting an eyelid at this.</p>
<p>As yet there appears to be no reaction on the Media Watch site, do I take it that even they are embarassed at being seen to object to this sort of thing, and they&#8217;re going to brush Turtle&#8217;s outburst under the carpet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judgemonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>Judgemonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>I seem to remember that some fella&#039; called Jesus did quite a lot of kissing for one reason or another. Oh, sorry that was the bible. Move along. Nothing to see!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to remember that some fella&#8217; called Jesus did quite a lot of kissing for one reason or another. Oh, sorry that was the bible. Move along. Nothing to see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olly</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/06/19/turtles-head-done-in-by-kiss/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Olly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=163#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>Yes, because everyone who has ever kissed someone of the same sex must be a raving homosexual out to corrupt the children of this country. A kiss can&#039;t have any context apart from the sexual, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, because everyone who has ever kissed someone of the same sex must be a raving homosexual out to corrupt the children of this country. A kiss can&#8217;t have any context apart from the sexual, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

