<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyer bays for BBFC board&#8217;s blood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-3100</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=178#comment-3100</guid>
		<description>Where do you stand on censorship, freedom of speech and open debate, Shaun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you stand on censorship, freedom of speech and open debate, Shaun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Hollingworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Hollingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=178#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>&quot;If Mediawatch and the Daily Mail had their way these films would have never seen the light of day.&quot;

If I had my way, Mediawatch and the DailyMail would no longer see the light of day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Mediawatch and the Daily Mail had their way these films would have never seen the light of day.&#8221;</p>
<p>If I had my way, Mediawatch and the DailyMail would no longer see the light of day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=178#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>It was no scarier than an episode of Dr Who and less violent than an episode of Eastenders( but just as dumb though). I presume these people have actually seen the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was no scarier than an episode of Dr Who and less violent than an episode of Eastenders( but just as dumb though). I presume these people have actually seen the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Factor</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-3007</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Factor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 11:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=178#comment-3007</guid>
		<description>The issue with Beyer and the Daily Mail is not what classifications the BBFC is giving films but the type of films the BBFC is giving classifications to altogether.
The BBFC has pisssed off Mediawatch and the Daily Mail by passing for release such films as Crash, Lolita and Le Baise Moi.
If Mediawatch and the Daily Mail had their way these films would have never seen the light of day.
Mediawatch and the Mail hold a grudge against the BBFC for not adhering to their houlier than thou standards. This is why they take the chance to bash them at every opportunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with Beyer and the Daily Mail is not what classifications the BBFC is giving films but the type of films the BBFC is giving classifications to altogether.<br />
The BBFC has pisssed off Mediawatch and the Daily Mail by passing for release such films as Crash, Lolita and Le Baise Moi.<br />
If Mediawatch and the Daily Mail had their way these films would have never seen the light of day.<br />
Mediawatch and the Mail hold a grudge against the BBFC for not adhering to their houlier than thou standards. This is why they take the chance to bash them at every opportunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Hollingworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Hollingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 20:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=178#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>Sorry, the BBFC guidelines should read:

&quot;No-one younger than 12 may see a ‘12A’ film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult. No-one younger than 12 may rent or buy a ‘12’ rated video or DVD. Responsibility for allowing under-12s to view lies with the accompanying or supervising adult.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the BBFC guidelines should read:</p>
<p>&#8220;No-one younger than 12 may see a ‘12A’ film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult. No-one younger than 12 may rent or buy a ‘12’ rated video or DVD. Responsibility for allowing under-12s to view lies with the accompanying or supervising adult.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Hollingworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Hollingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 20:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=178#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>The &quot;A&quot; can also stand for &quot;accompanied&quot; and this classification only applies to cinema, not to DVDs. It means that under 12s can only see the film in the cinema, if accompanied by an adult.
No-one younger than 12 may see a ‘12A’ film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult. 

From the BBFC guidelines:
&quot;
No-one younger than 12 may rent or buy a ‘12’ rated video or DVD. Responsibility for allowing under-12s to view lies with the accompanying or supervising adult.
&quot;

The film on a DVD would be classified as a 12, and no person under that age, would be allowed to buy the DVD.

The censorship brigade clearly do not know what they are talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;A&#8221; can also stand for &#8220;accompanied&#8221; and this classification only applies to cinema, not to DVDs. It means that under 12s can only see the film in the cinema, if accompanied by an adult.<br />
No-one younger than 12 may see a ‘12A’ film in a cinema unless accompanied by an adult. </p>
<p>From the BBFC guidelines:<br />
&#8221;<br />
No-one younger than 12 may rent or buy a ‘12’ rated video or DVD. Responsibility for allowing under-12s to view lies with the accompanying or supervising adult.<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>The film on a DVD would be classified as a 12, and no person under that age, would be allowed to buy the DVD.</p>
<p>The censorship brigade clearly do not know what they are talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Nixon</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2005/07/04/beyer-bays-for-bbfc-boards-blood/comment-page-1/#comment-2989</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 17:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=178#comment-2989</guid>
		<description>The A in 12A stands for Advice (or advisable, not quite sure). The BBFC issues advice with all 12A certifications (and with some PGs), which in this case reads &quot;Contains sustained menace, threat and moderate horror&quot; This makes it quite clear to parents that they might not want their kids to see the film.

If under 12s are seeing this film it is the fault of their parents, or of the cinemas, not the fault of the BBFC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The A in 12A stands for Advice (or advisable, not quite sure). The BBFC issues advice with all 12A certifications (and with some PGs), which in this case reads &#8220;Contains sustained menace, threat and moderate horror&#8221; This makes it quite clear to parents that they might not want their kids to see the film.</p>
<p>If under 12s are seeing this film it is the fault of their parents, or of the cinemas, not the fault of the BBFC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

