<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Channel 4 Wank-a-thon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew pearce</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-25191</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-25191</guid>
		<description>i am looking forward to seeing it. If you think it is offensive, don&#039;t watch it. The particapants are all aged eighteen and over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am looking forward to seeing it. If you think it is offensive, don&#8217;t watch it. The particapants are all aged eighteen and over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IV</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-18706</link>
		<dc:creator>IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-18706</guid>
		<description>Should be shown, will still be governed by ofcom policy so you won&#039;t see anything offensive anyway. It&#039;ll just be interviews with a bunch of tossers trying to justify their reasons for doing such a wanky thing. Wankers the lot of &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be shown, will still be governed by ofcom policy so you won&#8217;t see anything offensive anyway. It&#8217;ll just be interviews with a bunch of tossers trying to justify their reasons for doing such a wanky thing. Wankers the lot of &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15813</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15813</guid>
		<description>well if u dont want to watch it then urn ur daym tv off plain and simple and let the pepole who want to watch it watch it  end of problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well if u dont want to watch it then urn ur daym tv off plain and simple and let the pepole who want to watch it watch it  end of problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Scholey</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15807</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Scholey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15807</guid>
		<description>Who has said that it is mandatory to watch ????? 
What happened to the off button on the tv ???? 
Do we not live in a free country ????
As long as there is sufficient warning that adult
content is contained within the programm and that 
it is aired at a suitable time, I do not see why 
such a fuss is to be made !!!! There are atleast
3 terresrtial channels to be watched alternativly
to this programme,why watch it if you are offened 
by the subject.
SINCE WHEN HAVE WE BEEN MADE TO WATCH TELEVISION AT ALL ???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who has said that it is mandatory to watch ?????<br />
What happened to the off button on the tv ????<br />
Do we not live in a free country ????<br />
As long as there is sufficient warning that adult<br />
content is contained within the programm and that<br />
it is aired at a suitable time, I do not see why<br />
such a fuss is to be made !!!! There are atleast<br />
3 terresrtial channels to be watched alternativly<br />
to this programme,why watch it if you are offened<br />
by the subject.<br />
SINCE WHEN HAVE WE BEEN MADE TO WATCH TELEVISION AT ALL ???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earthhawk</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15374</link>
		<dc:creator>earthhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15374</guid>
		<description>The important question here is the age of the participants. We must protect the under 18s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important question here is the age of the participants. We must protect the under 18s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Deans Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15284</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Deans Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15284</guid>
		<description>When I saw the headline &quot;Channel Four to screen Wankathon&quot; in the papers, I assumed Jimmy Carr had been given another panel show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the headline &#8220;Channel Four to screen Wankathon&#8221; in the papers, I assumed Jimmy Carr had been given another panel show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Hollingworth</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15281</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Hollingworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15281</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking forward to seeing it. I commend channel 4 for making this program available.
Perhaps Mr. Beyer might watch it too ?

Oh, but it&#039;s not really necessary is it, because I think he knows enough about the subject matter already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing it. I commend channel 4 for making this program available.<br />
Perhaps Mr. Beyer might watch it too ?</p>
<p>Oh, but it&#8217;s not really necessary is it, because I think he knows enough about the subject matter already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Gilmour</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15235</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Gilmour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15235</guid>
		<description>Why oh why oh why couldn&#039;t he have used an expression like &quot;Channel 4 should pull the plug&quot;?? Unintentional double entendres would make him far less boring...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why oh why oh why couldn&#8217;t he have used an expression like &#8220;Channel 4 should pull the plug&#8221;?? Unintentional double entendres would make him far less boring&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This post is really just an excuse to make juvenile jokes (at wongaBlog)</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15214</link>
		<dc:creator>This post is really just an excuse to make juvenile jokes (at wongaBlog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15214</guid>
		<description>[...] Is it just men, do you think? Difficult to imagine many women turning up&#8230;The real fuss, however, is that Channel 4 are making a documentary about it: Cameras from independent production company Zig Zag, which made Essex Boys for ITV1, will follow the organisers and participants for a 60-minute film, which has the working title of Wank-a-thon. It is expected to air on Channel 4 towards the end of the year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is it just men, do you think? Difficult to imagine many women turning up&#8230;The real fuss, however, is that Channel 4 are making a documentary about it: Cameras from independent production company Zig Zag, which made Essex Boys for ITV1, will follow the organisers and participants for a 60-minute film, which has the working title of Wank-a-thon. It is expected to air on Channel 4 towards the end of the year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy A</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2006/07/18/channel-4-wank-a-thon/comment-page-1/#comment-15208</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 07:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=516#comment-15208</guid>
		<description>... or even the &#039;n&#039; instead of the &#039;l&#039;, which is what I meant to say. See what I mean ...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; or even the &#8216;n&#8217; instead of the &#8216;l&#8217;, which is what I meant to say. See what I mean &#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

