Comments on: BNP acquittal provokes menacing mutterings from Brown

By: Nick

Nick — Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:09:42 +0000

Hold on. that other Nick isn’t me…..

By: Stuart

Stuart — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:10:15 +0000

From something I saw in the Grauniad, maybe we could just lock them in a church and leave ‘em to it….

Apparently Trevor Philips of the CRE was at a meeting organised by the Evangelical Alliance (hope he had a clothes peg on his nose) at which he said that churches should refuse communion to BNP members. The EA’s head witch-hunter Joel Edwards also tried to suggest that the EA themselves were in the front line of the battle against BNP type bigotry.

Laugh? I nearly crossed myself!

By: Graham Deans Williamson

Graham Deans Williamson — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:21:32 +0000

Sharia law in Britain? Fat chance, you scaremongering illiterate cunt. Even the most fearmongering poll suggests that around 33%-40% of Muslims support Sharia law, and since Muslims comprise a mere three per cent of the total population, what does that tell you about the support for Sharia? If you answered “there isn’t much support for it”, well done, have a sweetie. If you answered “it meens teh muslims are coming and wee will all be under teh islams!1111″, well done, you are stupid enough to join the BNP.

All this aside, I do like the fact that we’ve been accused of being pro-Islam on this site now. Considering the number of people we’ve had screeching at us for being anti-Islamic, it reinforces my theory that you can tell when political commentators are doing a good job, as the dickheads and simpletons of both sides come out of the woodwork to criticise you.

By: Nick

Nick — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:29:02 +0000

ont worry about the BNP worry about the BBC and thier Islamic Butchering freinds
wake up Idiots, or get blow up.or better still have your head cut off, Sharia law is comming you liberal organic crunching mugs

By: Nick

Nick — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:21:21 +0000

You’re quite right, they don’t grow up, but the guys at the top do and then manipulate the children beneath them.(No sexual inuedeo intended). I believe that ridicule or totaly ignoring them is the best form of attack. (Oh I sound a bit wiered there)

By: aharon

aharon — Tue, 14 Nov 2006 14:42:54 +0000

I think that in many ways, your analogy with children is correct. e.g. faith “logic” works like a child’s – if Jane likes chocolate ice cream, as well as strawberry ice-cream, it must be that she likes cheesecakes as well.
However, unlike children, these guys don’t grow-up, nor grow out of it. I think its a kind of cultural autism – hence it requires more of special needs methods of dealing with..

By: Nick

Nick — Tue, 14 Nov 2006 04:02:33 +0000

I go along whith your arguement until ” wisely and intelligently” I’m sure tha you and me could discuse this wisely and intelligently, but we are talking about fanatical idiots.
When my kids were young and played up a bit, my wife and I used to laugh at them , then ignore them. Turned out alright. Just treat them as children

By: aharon

aharon — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:04:07 +0000

“Look, it’s best just to leave them alone in their own putrid shit. ”
Nick, that’s what I thought, specially regarding religious people. However because of the love of publicity such people demonstrate and get – people like you and me find our public space and freedoms slowly shrinking. Therefore, I think, unfortunate as this might be, they have to be confronted wisely and intelligently.

By: Nick

Nick — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:30:32 +0000

Look, it’s best just to leave them alone in their own putrid shit. They love the publicity.

By: Marc Draco

Marc Draco — Mon, 13 Nov 2006 00:09:26 +0000

I note the Muslim Lord Ahmed (?) is saying it’s fashionable to have go at Muslims now. So what? I “have a go” at any religious idiot who tries to bend my ear. We are born into our skin, not into our faith – that’s brainwashed in.