Comments on: There’s no pleasing some people http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/ Watching. Pointing. Laughing. Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mediawatchwatch.org.uk » Christian Institute throws a fit http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-111140 mediawatchwatch.org.uk » Christian Institute throws a fit Tue, 01 May 2007 08:09:52 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-111140 [...] fundamentalist homophobes of the Christian Institute are the latest to complain about the BBC broadcast of a gay Christian service from San Francisco last Sunday. Like the Daily Mail, they by seek to [...] [...] fundamentalist homophobes of the Christian Institute are the latest to complain about the BBC broadcast of a gay Christian service from San Francisco last Sunday. Like the Daily Mail, they by seek to [...]

]]> By: Nick http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-111091 Nick Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:51:24 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-111091 Radio4 doesn't conventional religion? They should try LW every morning, Bell On Sunday which is followed by religious programes for which seems like an eternity. Radio4 doesn’t conventional religion? They should try LW every morning, Bell On Sunday which is followed by religious programes for which seems like an eternity.

]]> By: Marc http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-111086 Marc Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:56:52 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-111086 I believe you, Chris... I'll pull the other one next time. I believe you, Chris… I’ll pull the other one next time.

]]> By: Chris http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-111077 Chris Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:25:22 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-111077 "What ‘re doin’ reading the Mail Chris?" Well erm, of course I wouldn't normally, it's just I followed the link in the article, yeah that's what happened, honest. “What ‘re doin’ reading the Mail Chris?”

Well erm, of course I wouldn’t normally, it’s just I followed the link in the article, yeah that’s what happened, honest.

]]> By: Marc http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-110970 Marc Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:45:44 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-110970 What 're doin' reading the Mail Chris? :-) Daily Mail readers are a bunch of bible punchers judging by its anti-scientific and pro-church bias. According to them GM foods are bad and Darwin was wrong. All these pronouncements from people without the foggiest clue of the good sience behind them. Frankenstein Food, the mail calls it. What they missed is that Frankenstein made a monster from dead bits and brought it back to life. GM food is living (plant) tissue that could help save millions from a miserable death by starvation. Yeah, I'm ranting, but this is the Daily Mail for Pete's sake. What ‘re doin’ reading the Mail Chris? :-)

Daily Mail readers are a bunch of bible punchers judging by its anti-scientific and pro-church bias. According to them GM foods are bad and Darwin was wrong. All these pronouncements from people without the foggiest clue of the good sience behind them. Frankenstein Food, the mail calls it. What they missed is that Frankenstein made a monster from dead bits and brought it back to life. GM food is living (plant) tissue that could help save millions from a miserable death by starvation. Yeah, I’m ranting, but this is the Daily Mail for Pete’s sake.

]]> By: Chris http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-110965 Chris Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:42:38 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-110965 Who'd of thought that the Daily Mail readers were so stupid? "In the interests of diversity and equality, any chance the BBC will broadcast Gay services for Moslems, Hindus, and others? Don't bet on it. - Roy, Southend, UK" Who’d of thought that the Daily Mail readers were so stupid?

“In the interests of diversity and equality, any chance the BBC will broadcast Gay services for Moslems, Hindus, and others? Don’t bet on it.

- Roy, Southend, UK”

]]> By: Ben http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-110923 Ben Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:53:08 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-110923 Hooray! It's been ages since I last saw "push back the boundaries of taste and decency", I thought they'd put that line into retirement. Hooray! It’s been ages since I last saw “push back the boundaries of taste and decency”, I thought they’d put that line into retirement.

]]> By: Marc http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-110921 Marc Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:45:12 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-110921 I like the way he gets thousands about right. Nearly 60 million folk here and only a few thousand to upset. Fucking minorities should learn from their own book and turn the other cheek - even if it's the other arse cheek as in this case. I like the way he gets thousands about right. Nearly 60 million folk here and only a few thousand to upset. Fucking minorities should learn from their own book and turn the other cheek – even if it’s the other arse cheek as in this case.

]]> By: Ian Charles http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/04/27/theres-no-pleasing-some-people/comment-page-1/#comment-110903 Ian Charles Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:14:19 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=712#comment-110903 homosexual bias? WTF? homosexual bias? WTF?

]]>