<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Da Vinci Code to be sued in Italy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/06/25/da-vinci-code-to-be-sued-in-italy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/06/25/da-vinci-code-to-be-sued-in-italy/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Gilmour</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/06/25/da-vinci-code-to-be-sued-in-italy/comment-page-1/#comment-113268</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Gilmour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=745#comment-113268</guid>
		<description>Article 528 is &quot;obscenity on religious grounds&quot;.

Apparently.

I was just nosey, and the reuters article didn&#039;t clarify.

Oh, and it appears to have been dropped!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article 528 is &#8220;obscenity on religious grounds&#8221;.</p>
<p>Apparently.</p>
<p>I was just nosey, and the reuters article didn&#8217;t clarify.</p>
<p>Oh, and it appears to have been dropped!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

