Comments on: Christian SOR ad judged “untruthful”

By: Parma Violets

Parma Violets — Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:28:12 +0000

Any group who have to point out in their own name that they’re “coherent” are probably protesting a bit too much.

By: marc

marc — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:55:33 +0000

They “can” fine the perps in theory IIRC, but in practise it’s more a case of a slap on the wrist and “you’ll have to remove the ad guys” but as is the case in the majority of these instances, the message has already been trasmitted. I believe SCE have done this a few times as have Virgin and several other big names. It’s time the ASA had bigger teeth and the muscle to use them.

By: David Cantrell

David Cantrell — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:06:19 +0000

OK, so the ASA have determined that they lied. What are they going to do about it? Nothing.

By: marc

marc — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:02:52 +0000

So what does the SOR do for gay people?

By: BSE

BSE — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:12:39 +0000

Mmmm what is funny about this ruling is that the provisional one was made months ago and CCV took ages to get their fingers out of their arses to reply… maybe they were not feeling very christian at the time… idiots…