<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Undercover Mosque conclusions and questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/11/20/undercover-mosque-conclusions-and-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/11/20/undercover-mosque-conclusions-and-questions/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/11/20/undercover-mosque-conclusions-and-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-139235</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=866#comment-139235</guid>
		<description>&#039;there is freedom of the press, but that is no reason to target a select community in this way&#039;
So, there is freedom of the press, but it should only be used to expose breaches of the law if they are by non muslims. 
Unfortunately, this view is beoming all too prevalent amongst our institutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;there is freedom of the press, but that is no reason to target a select community in this way&#8217;<br />
So, there is freedom of the press, but it should only be used to expose breaches of the law if they are by non muslims.<br />
Unfortunately, this view is beoming all too prevalent amongst our institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thevets</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/11/20/undercover-mosque-conclusions-and-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-139212</link>
		<dc:creator>thevets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=866#comment-139212</guid>
		<description>In 2004 the Saudi government refused visas to jews. &quot;Jews barred in Saudi tourist drive&quot; BBC news 27 Feb 2004. 
In 2007 they go to Schillings a libel firm from whose website it appears they have at least 2 jewish partners out of 6. 
In October this year Partner Rachel Atkins was guest speaker at a seminar for the Jewish Association for Business Ethics.
Money? ....integrity?.....money?.....integrity?.....no contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2004 the Saudi government refused visas to jews. &#8220;Jews barred in Saudi tourist drive&#8221; BBC news 27 Feb 2004.<br />
In 2007 they go to Schillings a libel firm from whose website it appears they have at least 2 jewish partners out of 6.<br />
In October this year Partner Rachel Atkins was guest speaker at a seminar for the Jewish Association for Business Ethics.<br />
Money? &#8230;.integrity?&#8230;..money?&#8230;..integrity?&#8230;..no contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

