<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baptists back blasphemy abolition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/01/21/baptists-back-blasphemy-abolition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/01/21/baptists-back-blasphemy-abolition/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart H</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/01/21/baptists-back-blasphemy-abolition/comment-page-1/#comment-142674</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=909#comment-142674</guid>
		<description>I suspect good old sectarianism, rather than freedom of speech, is the motive here. From a Baptist point of view, the real problem with the UK blasphemy law is that it only protects the C of E!
As for Baptists and other faiths - can&#039;t see how a rabidly evangelical cult who think they have a god-given right to convert other faiths and even other Christian denominations can have &#039;respect&#039; for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect good old sectarianism, rather than freedom of speech, is the motive here. From a Baptist point of view, the real problem with the UK blasphemy law is that it only protects the C of E!<br />
As for Baptists and other faiths &#8211; can&#8217;t see how a rabidly evangelical cult who think they have a god-given right to convert other faiths and even other Christian denominations can have &#8216;respect&#8217; for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresno Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/01/21/baptists-back-blasphemy-abolition/comment-page-1/#comment-142612</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresno Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=909#comment-142612</guid>
		<description>I can see it coming... just like the end of slavery, the liberation of women, the social acceptance of homosexuality and the promotion of democracy and personal liberties, we&#039;ll have to add the abolition of the blasphemy law to the lengthy list of things for which we have Christianity to thank!

I&#039;m surprised that wanker D&#039;Souza isn&#039;t already peddling this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see it coming&#8230; just like the end of slavery, the liberation of women, the social acceptance of homosexuality and the promotion of democracy and personal liberties, we&#8217;ll have to add the abolition of the blasphemy law to the lengthy list of things for which we have Christianity to thank!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised that wanker D&#8217;Souza isn&#8217;t already peddling this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/01/21/baptists-back-blasphemy-abolition/comment-page-1/#comment-142598</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=909#comment-142598</guid>
		<description>Bit of a double-edged sword really.

It&#039;s backfired royally on &quot;Dog Shit&quot; Green, but like Rev Williams suggests &quot;expression of faith, Christian or otherwise, is now protected by other legal provision.&quot; and it shouldn&#039;t be. While no one should have the right to persecute a person on the grounds of their faith, we should retain the right to critique and dissemintate all religion at its core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit of a double-edged sword really.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s backfired royally on &#8220;Dog Shit&#8221; Green, but like Rev Williams suggests &#8220;expression of faith, Christian or otherwise, is now protected by other legal provision.&#8221; and it shouldn&#8217;t be. While no one should have the right to persecute a person on the grounds of their faith, we should retain the right to critique and dissemintate all religion at its core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

