<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plant reference puts willies up Auntie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/02/06/plant-reference-puts-willies-up-auntie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/02/06/plant-reference-puts-willies-up-auntie/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GagWatch &#187; BBC shafted by PC stiffs</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/02/06/plant-reference-puts-willies-up-auntie/comment-page-1/#comment-143649</link>
		<dc:creator>GagWatch &#187; BBC shafted by PC stiffs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=924#comment-143649</guid>
		<description>[...] BBC on Tuesday managed to issue an apology (via) over that most staid of Radio 4&#8217;s programming, Gardner&#8217;s Question [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BBC on Tuesday managed to issue an apology (via) over that most staid of Radio 4&#8217;s programming, Gardner&#8217;s Question [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/02/06/plant-reference-puts-willies-up-auntie/comment-page-1/#comment-143276</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=924#comment-143276</guid>
		<description>Yes, pathetic. Had it been called a white mans willy everyone would have just chortled and that would be it, but BLACK mans willy how offensive.

And they also said it was playing on racial stereotypes...presumably the stereotype that black guys all have big cocks...one all black guys presumably would like to keep going!!

Lets bet the complaints were made by small willied white blokes or their wives...jealousy thats what it is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, pathetic. Had it been called a white mans willy everyone would have just chortled and that would be it, but BLACK mans willy how offensive.</p>
<p>And they also said it was playing on racial stereotypes&#8230;presumably the stereotype that black guys all have big cocks&#8230;one all black guys presumably would like to keep going!!</p>
<p>Lets bet the complaints were made by small willied white blokes or their wives&#8230;jealousy thats what it is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

