<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Condell is back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/04/condell-is-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/04/condell-is-back/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/04/condell-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-177327</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1390#comment-177327</guid>
		<description>I see this as a serious problem - that a video can be flagged and immediately removed; rather than given the benefit. This rather reminds me of the problem faced by rape suspects who are exposed by the red-tops long before they are even found guilty; and often are found completely innocent to boot.

While I agree that pure hate speech crosses the boundary of free speech, Condell clearly only states his arguments well and robustly. Clearly some elements can&#039;t deal with that.

I want to see what happens when and if, Pat comes back and tells Christians (evangelicals in particular) that much of what they hold dear in the bible is actually made up. Recent findings, I understand, now tell a tale where (Mark) reports that Jesus&#039;s body was missing from the tomb, the last (and clinching) twelve or so verses were added many, many years later to add colour to the story.

Many things that Jebo did, are in fact, complete fictions according to the earliest bibles. I&#039;d love to hear Condell on that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this as a serious problem &#8211; that a video can be flagged and immediately removed; rather than given the benefit. This rather reminds me of the problem faced by rape suspects who are exposed by the red-tops long before they are even found guilty; and often are found completely innocent to boot.</p>
<p>While I agree that pure hate speech crosses the boundary of free speech, Condell clearly only states his arguments well and robustly. Clearly some elements can&#8217;t deal with that.</p>
<p>I want to see what happens when and if, Pat comes back and tells Christians (evangelicals in particular) that much of what they hold dear in the bible is actually made up. Recent findings, I understand, now tell a tale where (Mark) reports that Jesus&#8217;s body was missing from the tomb, the last (and clinching) twelve or so verses were added many, many years later to add colour to the story.</p>
<p>Many things that Jebo did, are in fact, complete fictions according to the earliest bibles. I&#8217;d love to hear Condell on that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc draco</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/04/condell-is-back/comment-page-1/#comment-177296</link>
		<dc:creator>marc draco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1390#comment-177296</guid>
		<description>The problem with knee-jerk reactions is that they are just that. Who would have ever thought that Youtube could become a free-speech battleground?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with knee-jerk reactions is that they are just that. Who would have ever thought that Youtube could become a free-speech battleground?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

