<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enfield in trouble again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/07/enfield-in-trouble-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/07/enfield-in-trouble-again/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rod Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/07/enfield-in-trouble-again/comment-page-1/#comment-177463</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1399#comment-177463</guid>
		<description>Harry Enfield is quoted as saying he was told &#039;not to go there&#039; 
with regard to a sketch on a paedophile. Yet in last night&#039;s
show he had an American couple dropping hints about paedophilia
with reference to a sports team called the Paedos.What is his problem?
Paedophiles ain&#039;t funny mate, and please don&#039;t give me any old
intellectual nonsense about breaking boundaries in comedy - it&#039;s not
on Harry. Drop it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Enfield is quoted as saying he was told &#8216;not to go there&#8217;<br />
with regard to a sketch on a paedophile. Yet in last night&#8217;s<br />
show he had an American couple dropping hints about paedophilia<br />
with reference to a sports team called the Paedos.What is his problem?<br />
Paedophiles ain&#8217;t funny mate, and please don&#8217;t give me any old<br />
intellectual nonsense about breaking boundaries in comedy &#8211; it&#8217;s not<br />
on Harry. Drop it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart H.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/07/enfield-in-trouble-again/comment-page-1/#comment-177446</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1399#comment-177446</guid>
		<description>Wonder who the Philippine Ambassador employs to do his cleaning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder who the Philippine Ambassador employs to do his cleaning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Hoskins</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/07/enfield-in-trouble-again/comment-page-1/#comment-177399</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Hoskins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1399#comment-177399</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the YouTube links.  I&#039;m a Northerner and I thought they were extremely funny.  In fact, where can I get a &quot;Beware of the Northerner&quot; sign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the YouTube links.  I&#8217;m a Northerner and I thought they were extremely funny.  In fact, where can I get a &#8220;Beware of the Northerner&#8221; sign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/07/enfield-in-trouble-again/comment-page-1/#comment-177377</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1399#comment-177377</guid>
		<description>&quot;racism sniffers are not very good at detecting absurdity or irony.&quot;

That would be because by and large they are utterly humourless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;racism sniffers are not very good at detecting absurdity or irony.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be because by and large they are utterly humourless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GagWatch &#187; Religious restrictions for Harry Enfield</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/07/enfield-in-trouble-again/comment-page-1/#comment-177361</link>
		<dc:creator>GagWatch &#187; Religious restrictions for Harry Enfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1399#comment-177361</guid>
		<description>[...] years to make Harry and Paul, a sketch show with a completely new gallery of characters and, as Media Watch Watch notes, the post-watershed comedy has already fallen afoul of religious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years to make Harry and Paul, a sketch show with a completely new gallery of characters and, as Media Watch Watch notes, the post-watershed comedy has already fallen afoul of religious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
