<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Painting of lady with pig provokes &#8220;disgust&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:49:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gabriele Marranci</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-178346</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriele Marranci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-178346</guid>
		<description>Who knows why, I am not surprised about these attacks, I would have been surprised if the usual violent imbeciles whom for ‘feeling to be Muslims’ need to show their small brains and alleged big muscles, would have spoiled this tasty occasion for gifting us with their anti-social behavior.
Yet I have to admit that Miss Maple’s works (in particular the videos, photos and paintings full of sexual innuendo of very little artistic values) are not what I would call art.
I know that other critics of art have expressed some doubts about her production. I wonder, indeed, how much the ‘muslim’ themes of her works may be a short-cut for an ‘easy’ success. But this is just my opinion.
http://marranci.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/sarah-maple-loves-jihad/#more-141</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who knows why, I am not surprised about these attacks, I would have been surprised if the usual violent imbeciles whom for ‘feeling to be Muslims’ need to show their small brains and alleged big muscles, would have spoiled this tasty occasion for gifting us with their anti-social behavior.<br />
Yet I have to admit that Miss Maple’s works (in particular the videos, photos and paintings full of sexual innuendo of very little artistic values) are not what I would call art.<br />
I know that other critics of art have expressed some doubts about her production. I wonder, indeed, how much the ‘muslim’ themes of her works may be a short-cut for an ‘easy’ success. But this is just my opinion.<br />
<a href="http://marranci.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/sarah-maple-loves-jihad/#more-141" rel="nofollow">http://marranci.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/sarah-maple-loves-jihad/#more-141</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177661</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177661</guid>
		<description>Shame that YouTube seem to have pulled the video :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame that YouTube seem to have pulled the video <img src='http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart H.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177578</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177578</guid>
		<description>I forgot to say beofre, if they&#039;re so offended by the picture, they could always hang it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to say beofre, if they&#8217;re so offended by the picture, they could always hang it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Gilmour</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177576</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Gilmour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177576</guid>
		<description>hmmm...

just looked at what I wrote again, and I reckon

&quot;pig-carrying strumpets!&quot;

sounds better...

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>just looked at what I wrote again, and I reckon</p>
<p>&#8220;pig-carrying strumpets!&#8221;</p>
<p>sounds better&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democritus</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177575</link>
		<dc:creator>Democritus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177575</guid>
		<description>These attacks on paintings, film, theater, etc. amount to cultural terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These attacks on paintings, film, theater, etc. amount to cultural terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Gilmour</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177569</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Gilmour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177569</guid>
		<description>jr,

Ah, but if they *see* a woman flagrantly and provocatively holding a pig, then they might be tempted to do it to.

Damn those pig-carrying whores!

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jr,</p>
<p>Ah, but if they *see* a woman flagrantly and provocatively holding a pig, then they might be tempted to do it to.</p>
<p>Damn those pig-carrying whores!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177566</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177566</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a strange painting, and an odd thing to get upset about. Does anyone know precisely why this should be offensive to muslims? Given that no-one&#039;s asking them to hold a pig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a strange painting, and an odd thing to get upset about. Does anyone know precisely why this should be offensive to muslims? Given that no-one&#8217;s asking them to hold a pig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177556</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177556</guid>
		<description>Hmm, muslim women aren&#039;t the only ones who wear scarves ... might be trying to read a bit too much into that painting, perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, muslim women aren&#8217;t the only ones who wear scarves &#8230; might be trying to read a bit too much into that painting, perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177535</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177535</guid>
		<description>The Muslim council offended? Who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Muslim council offended? Who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart H.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2008/10/13/painting-of-lady-with-pig-provokes-disgust/comment-page-1/#comment-177534</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=1411#comment-177534</guid>
		<description>&#039;Muslims believe that all of God’s creatures should be treated with respect&#039;....
How do you stone women to death respectfully, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Muslims believe that all of God’s creatures should be treated with respect&#8217;&#8230;.<br />
How do you stone women to death respectfully, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
