Comments on: Crucified frog director is sacked

By: TigerDunc

TigerDunc — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 12:59:53 +0000

What does the frog have in it’s left hand? Looks like a pint mug in the right, which I heartily approve.

Does the moral indignation of the religious come as any surprise? They have a god given right to supress anything with which they don’t agree after all, and freedom of expression is an entirely alien concept to them.

By: Alfster

Alfster — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 22:06:20 +0000

Presumably the Catholics think the director is the frog-spawn of the devil.

By: Angela K

Angela K — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:19:41 +0000

The ‘cross’ is both a symbol and instrument of torture so perhaps should have been removed because it is offensive to frogs, not brain dead Mary-worshippers

By: martyn

martyn — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:10:04 +0000

Put that on the bendy buses as well I say.

By: Stuart H.

Stuart H. — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:18:18 +0000

Don’t really get the Catholic objection – thought they’d been bumping off pagan, little green nature worshipper types for years anyway.
Actually, that image is SO how most of us feel after a bad day!
If the biscuit munchers don’t want it maybe the Kippenberg estate could be persuaded to let some secular group run it as a poster, T-shirt.. whatever. We could use it to raise funds to oppose religious bods who oppose freedom of speech, mutilate girls, and generally make life miserable for everyone.

By: marc

marc — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:48:55 +0000

This is what happens when you give people the idea that they are better than the rest of us. It’s rather like spoiling a child with sweets for years and then watching is horror how they react when you refuse.

Religious people think that way. No getting away from it.

By: jr

jr — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:05:40 +0000

These retards will burn in hell for dissing the green messiah. As it says in the book of kermit: blessed are the spawnmakers, for they will inherit the pond of heaven.