Comments on: Sex corpse art in medical porn rap

By: barriejohn

barriejohn — Mon, 11 May 2009 08:50:35 +0000

PS The more they squeal, the more he likes it!!!

By: barriejohn

barriejohn — Mon, 11 May 2009 08:39:27 +0000

I agree with Stonyground again (as usual!). I`m afraid I can`t get at all worked up about this whole story because of my view that von Hagens is just another incurable publicity junkie!!

By: Stonyground

Stonyground — Sat, 09 May 2009 16:30:46 +0000

To be honest I find this pretty revolting and distasteful but for some reason I don’t feel the need to kick off and start screaming for it to be banned. If other people find it interesting and want to see it I’m fine with that.

By: Mr B’s Hot Link Injection for the 8th May « Mr Blackett’s House o’Sex

Fri, 08 May 2009 19:02:34 +0000

[...] Sex corpse art in medical porn rap | MediaWatchWatch: Gunther von Hagens’ new exhibition, Cycle of Life, has caused outrage among Church representatives and a cross party group of politicians because it includes a couple of corpses having sex. [...]

By: Timothy

Timothy — Fri, 08 May 2009 18:19:38 +0000

It’s a bit odd expecting them to come when they’ve already gone.

By: Chris Hall

Chris Hall — Fri, 08 May 2009 09:02:05 +0000

It’s a good thing he didn’t depict a living person having sex with a corpse, as anyone in possession (including looking online) of such an image would have to be locked up in prison for three years as a result of the new “extreme” pornography laws.

Interestingly I just recently discovered that necrophilia was only made illegal in the UK under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Before 2003 the only thing you could be charged with was criminal damage. (well I thought it was interesting)

By: Mark

Mark — Thu, 07 May 2009 20:58:35 +0000

It's a good thing he didn't depict a living person having sex with a corpse, as anyone in possession (including looking online) of such an image would have to be locked up in prison for three years as a result of the new "extreme" pornography laws. However, my understanding is that an image depicting *two* corpses having sex together is absolutely fine and legal.

By: BSE

BSE — Thu, 07 May 2009 15:52:01 +0000

“This is casual corpse sex, people!” has to be the friggin best line that I have read so far this year! Now can we have some gay casual corpse sex?