<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For god&#8217;s sake, Kirstie &#8211; now we have to reshoot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: barriejohn</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179953</link>
		<dc:creator>barriejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179953</guid>
		<description>Am I the only person who has never heard of Kirsty Allsopp?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person who has never heard of Kirsty Allsopp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179951</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179951</guid>
		<description>Hahahaha - you sound like a great parent, Stuart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahaha &#8211; you sound like a great parent, Stuart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart H.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179950</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179950</guid>
		<description>I stand suitably chastised, Ophelia. What makes my offence worse is that I&#039;d already made a mental note of this after you chewed out some herbert or other on your blog for the same offence! In my defence, as my small child cannot look at George Bush or the  Pope without laughing I&#039;m not such a bad parent.
And anyway, accusing someone of rampant estate agency is probably quite enough to be going on with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand suitably chastised, Ophelia. What makes my offence worse is that I&#8217;d already made a mental note of this after you chewed out some herbert or other on your blog for the same offence! In my defence, as my small child cannot look at George Bush or the  Pope without laughing I&#8217;m not such a bad parent.<br />
And anyway, accusing someone of rampant estate agency is probably quite enough to be going on with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179946</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179946</guid>
		<description>On the other hand - for the information of Stuart H - &#039;twat&#039; in fact means cunt which means female genitalia. Swearing is one thing and sexist epithets are another. This is not widely accepted in the UK (witness &#039;twattishness&#039; in the disclaimer!) but that is a blind spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand &#8211; for the information of Stuart H &#8211; &#8216;twat&#8217; in fact means cunt which means female genitalia. Swearing is one thing and sexist epithets are another. This is not widely accepted in the UK (witness &#8216;twattishness&#8217; in the disclaimer!) but that is a blind spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179945</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179945</guid>
		<description>Jesus fucking christ on a raft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus fucking christ on a raft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart H.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179942</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179942</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d second that, j.r. Is there anything more likely to make you spout inappropriate language in front of small, impressionable kids than a fat, smug  estate agent on prime time TV.
.....on the other hand, at least sprogs quickly learn from your purple face that &#039;twat&#039; is shorthand for priests, politicians.... or other klingons who should be avoided like the plague!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d second that, j.r. Is there anything more likely to make you spout inappropriate language in front of small, impressionable kids than a fat, smug  estate agent on prime time TV.<br />
&#8230;..on the other hand, at least sprogs quickly learn from your purple face that &#8216;twat&#8217; is shorthand for priests, politicians&#8230;. or other klingons who should be avoided like the plague!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.r.</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179932</link>
		<dc:creator>j.r.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179932</guid>
		<description>Coincidentally whenever Allsopp appears on the box I find myself shouting &quot;for christ&#039;s sake change the channel&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally whenever Allsopp appears on the box I find myself shouting &#8220;for christ&#8217;s sake change the channel&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela K</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179925</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179925</guid>
		<description>It’s outrageous using disgusting language like that on TV, it is offensive to secularists. There are more suitable words she could use such as F**k &amp; Bl**dy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s outrageous using disgusting language like that on TV, it is offensive to secularists. There are more suitable words she could use such as F**k &amp; Bl**dy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barriejohn</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/06/04/for-gods-sake-kirstie-now-we-have-to-reshoot/comment-page-1/#comment-179924</link>
		<dc:creator>barriejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2041#comment-179924</guid>
		<description>Call me oldfashioned, but if TV presenters can`t talk without constantly using expletives, then perhaps they should consider a different vocation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me oldfashioned, but if TV presenters can`t talk without constantly using expletives, then perhaps they should consider a different vocation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

