<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support for UN religious defamation rule drops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/11/16/support-for-un-religious-defamation-rule-drops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/11/16/support-for-un-religious-defamation-rule-drops/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/11/16/support-for-un-religious-defamation-rule-drops/comment-page-1/#comment-180807</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2477#comment-180807</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why the heck should anyone be free from defamation?  Let’s face it, you only want this law if you’ve got something to hide.&quot;

So there should be no defamation or libel laws?  Someone should be able to publish that your mother is a disease ridden prostitute?  I mean, if she&#039;s got nothing to hide...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why the heck should anyone be free from defamation?  Let’s face it, you only want this law if you’ve got something to hide.&#8221;</p>
<p>So there should be no defamation or libel laws?  Someone should be able to publish that your mother is a disease ridden prostitute?  I mean, if she&#8217;s got nothing to hide&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: December 1 roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/11/16/support-for-un-religious-defamation-rule-drops/comment-page-1/#comment-180802</link>
		<dc:creator>December 1 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2477#comment-180802</guid>
		<description>[...] for UN religious defamation rule drops&#8221; [Media Watch Watch] On the other hand? &#8220;Envoy&#8217;s Speech Signals Softening of U.S. Hostility to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for UN religious defamation rule drops&#8221; [Media Watch Watch] On the other hand? &#8220;Envoy&#8217;s Speech Signals Softening of U.S. Hostility to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/11/16/support-for-un-religious-defamation-rule-drops/comment-page-1/#comment-180772</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2477#comment-180772</guid>
		<description>Why the heck should anyone be free from defamation?

Let&#039;s face it, you only want this law if you&#039;ve got something to hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the heck should anyone be free from defamation?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, you only want this law if you&#8217;ve got something to hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dajjal</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2009/11/16/support-for-un-religious-defamation-rule-drops/comment-page-1/#comment-180771</link>
		<dc:creator>Dajjal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2477#comment-180771</guid>
		<description>The Ad Hoc Cmte. was scheduled to meet from Oct. 19 to Oct. 30. It appears that they did not reach agreement on procedural matters or substantive issues.  I want to find out when they will meet for their next session. 

There is one way to counter attack. Islamic doctrine and practice violates ICCPR, ICERD &amp; CPPCG.  We can tell the world about that fact by means of the International Qur&#039;an Petition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ad Hoc Cmte. was scheduled to meet from Oct. 19 to Oct. 30. It appears that they did not reach agreement on procedural matters or substantive issues.  I want to find out when they will meet for their next session. </p>
<p>There is one way to counter attack. Islamic doctrine and practice violates ICCPR, ICERD &amp; CPPCG.  We can tell the world about that fact by means of the International Qur&#8217;an Petition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

