<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Sorry you were offended&#8221; Danish paper concedes to Saudi lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2010/02/26/sorry-you-were-offended-danish-paper-concedes-to-saudi-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2010/02/26/sorry-you-were-offended-danish-paper-concedes-to-saudi-lawyers/</link>
	<description>Watching. Pointing. Laughing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terri</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2010/02/26/sorry-you-were-offended-danish-paper-concedes-to-saudi-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-181187</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2601#comment-181187</guid>
		<description>But I don&#039;t have a problem with them saying &quot;sorry you were offended&quot;. 
If they are not saying &quot;sorry for printing it&quot; then that&#039;s different!
One could add &quot;sorry you were offended because of your narrow minded and bigotted view of free speech based on your superstitious mythology&quot;.
I&#039;d like to express pity for people who base their lives on the nonsense of religions, therefore I am sorry they are religious. That doesn&#039;t mean I am responsible for their religiousity any more than the Danish paper is responsible for their &quot;offence&quot;.
I am sorry that people are offended by a couple of silly cartoons, but it would not stop me wanting to publish them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I don&#8217;t have a problem with them saying &#8220;sorry you were offended&#8221;.<br />
If they are not saying &#8220;sorry for printing it&#8221; then that&#8217;s different!<br />
One could add &#8220;sorry you were offended because of your narrow minded and bigotted view of free speech based on your superstitious mythology&#8221;.<br />
I&#8217;d like to express pity for people who base their lives on the nonsense of religions, therefore I am sorry they are religious. That doesn&#8217;t mean I am responsible for their religiousity any more than the Danish paper is responsible for their &#8220;offence&#8221;.<br />
I am sorry that people are offended by a couple of silly cartoons, but it would not stop me wanting to publish them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2010/02/26/sorry-you-were-offended-danish-paper-concedes-to-saudi-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-181146</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2601#comment-181146</guid>
		<description>Everyone is terrified in case Gaddafi calls for jihad against them :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is terrified in case Gaddafi calls for jihad against them <img src='http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barriejohn</title>
		<link>http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2010/02/26/sorry-you-were-offended-danish-paper-concedes-to-saudi-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-181145</link>
		<dc:creator>barriejohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=2601#comment-181145</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous beyond belief! But as they say in &lt;i&gt;Private Eye&lt;/i&gt;: &quot;I wonder whether you might have a photograph of...&quot; well, you know the rest!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous beyond belief! But as they say in <i>Private Eye</i>: &#8220;I wonder whether you might have a photograph of&#8230;&#8221; well, you know the rest!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

